Posts Tagged ‘computer animation’

Saying Goodbye: Toy Story 3 – Part Five

Wednesday, January 5th, 2011
This article is part of the series Saying Goodbye – Toy Story 3. To jump to any other article in the series, please use the following links.
Part OnePart TwoPart ThreePart FourPart Five

Andy holds Woody for the last time

We’re quickly approaching the wrap-up phase of the story, where all but the most major problems facing the toys will be solved in a quick yet satisfying way. As in Toy Story 2, the seemingly impossible task of getting the toys home in turns out to be far less difficult than it looks. Sid’s earlier cameo pays off by allowing the toys to identify the garbage truck that will take them back to Andy. Even if we don’t realize that the garbageman is Sid, we and the toys both remember his penchant for rocking out. Why the garbage truck is visiting Andy’s home for the second time in less than a week is never explained, but it’s a minor detail and again, the movie provides solid answers to most other questions we might have, so I’m okay with letting one or two slide. The toys return to Andy’s house and hose themselves off, keeping Andy’s happiness at discovering his old toys weren’t thrown away from being tempered by puzzlement over why they’re covered in grim and non-toxic finger paints and smell like a dump. Since Andy’s room is nearly empty, Mrs. Potato Head can easily locate her missing eye. The only issue that isn’t yet resolved is the one that has been plaguing the toys since the start of the movie: where do they belong now that Andy has outgrown them?

Where the toys belong.

Toy Story 3′s Best Picture Campaign

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

Not since Shakespeare in Love

The holiday craziness has finally caught up with me. The good news is that I had a great time with lots of friends and family who I don’t get to see very often and among the gifts I received are a couple of items that will likely be fodder for future articles. The bad news is that I haven’t had time to put together the final installment of my Toy Story 3 analysis. But that doesn’t mean I don’t have anything for you this week. With something as interesting as the ad campaign to get Toy Story 3 nominated for the Best Picture Oscar.

Studios putting out ads asking Academy voters to consider their films for particular honors is nothing new. But the aggressive push to get an animated film into the running for the top honor is a more recent phenomenon. The expansion of the number of Best Picture nominees from five to ten has put the top prize (or at least advancement to the final round) within the reach of a greater range of movies. Up being chosen as one of the Elite Ten for the 2010 Academy Awards made it clear that animated films had an equal shot at being nominated. Disney and Pixar aren’t alone in seeking Best Picture consideration for their animated offerings; I’ve seen ads from Dreamworks promoting How To Train Your Dragon as a potential Best Picture nominee. What’s garnering attention for the Toy Story 3 campaign is the comparisons it draws between the Pixar film and past Best Picture winners. The intent is not to suggest that Toy Story 3 is like all of these movies rolled into one, but to remind Academy voters of past winners that may not have fit the stereotypical Best Picture mold. Combined with the mention of the movie’s near-universal critical acclaim, it makes a strong case for Toy Story 3 as a Best Picture nominee.

Will it work? I wouldn’t be surprised, at least as far as the nomination goes. Toy Story 3 has enjoyed both commercial and critical success. It’s shown up on enough “Best of the Year” lists that it’s exclusion from the field of Best Picture nominees would raise quite a few eyebrows. But can it go all the way? I want to believe that an animated movie can win the Oscar for Best Picture. All the same, I realize that animation hasn’t completely escaped the unfair “kiddie flicks” label it’s been saddled with in the U.S. Even putting that aside, Toy Story 3 is a film that can be enjoyed by young kids as well as adults. It’s a fantastic family film, but the Academy isn’t known for handing the Best Picture award to family films (or comedies or anything other than a drama). While I do love the movie, I haven’t seen every other film that came out this year, so I can’t say for certain whether it will be the most deserving of the ten films up for the award. I can see Toy Story 3 getting a Best Picture nomination and possibly walking away with the Best Animated Feature award. But I’ll be very surprised if Pixar manages to crack the animation glass ceiling and take the Best Picture Oscar home.

Image in this article is copyright Disney/Pixar.

Saying Goodbye: Toy Story 3 – Part Four

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010
This article is part of the series Saying Goodbye – Toy Story 3. To jump to any other article in the series, please use the following links.
Part OnePart TwoPart ThreePart FourPart Five

Ken gets down

We know almost right away that Mr. Potato Head’s attempted escape is part of the plan. Even before the tortilla comes into play, we see that it’s a diversion to keep the cymbal monkey occupied so that Slinky can escape. What Barbie is up to is a little less clear. There’s no acknowledgement from either Barbie or the other characters that her plea for Ken to take her back is also part of the plan. We still don’t know Barbie quite as well as we know the rest of the toys, so it’s not beyond thinking that she really has broken down under the stress of incarceration in the Butterfly Room. She has started to prove her loyalty to the toys by choosing to share their fate rather than stay with her new boyfriend. But when we learn what she’s really doing at Ken’s Dream House, her status as part of the toys’ family is confirmed.

Ken\’s fashion show under the cut.

Saying Goodbye: Toy Story 3 – Part Three

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010
This article is part of the series Saying Goodbye – Toy Story 3. To jump to any other article in the series, please use the following links.
Part OnePart TwoPart ThreePart FourPart Five

Buzz and Lotso

The reveal of Lotso’s true nature comes slowly. We might suspect that he knew more than he let on about the kind of playtime the toys could expect in the Caterpillar Room. As the toy in charge at Sunnyside, how could he not? But when Buzz breaks out of the Caterpillar Room and discovers the Butterfly Room elite gambling in the top of a vending machine, it raises the possibility that something is going on behind Lotso’s back. These are the toys that we and Buzz hear dismissing the newcomers as “toddler fodder” unlikely to last very long. And when Lotso discovers that the other toys have tied Buzz up to interrogate him, his concern seems genuine. Even his explanation for the way Sunnyside is run doesn’t sound unreasonable to either Buzz or the audience. It’s not possible for all of the toys to stay in the Butterfly Room; some of them would inevitably be moved back into the Caterpillar Room by Sunnyside’s human staff. And the idea of putting the newest toys in with the toddlers, with the promise of someday moving up to the Butterfly Room, sounds like a fair system. But the other toys’ suggestions from earlier that Buzz and his friends are unlikely to last a week at Sunnyside hints at how the system is completely stacked against any new toy. Buzz doesn’t know this yet. He gets on Lotso’s bad side not by figuring out that the Caterpillar Room toys don’t stand a chance, but by turning down Lotso’s offer to move into the Butterfly Room while his friends remain where they are,

Lotso as a villain, behind the cut.

Saying Goodbye: Toy Story 3 – Part Two

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010
This article is part of the series Saying Goodbye – Toy Story 3. To jump to any other article in the series, please use the following links.
Part OnePart TwoPart ThreePart FourPart Five

The entrance to Sunnyside Daycare

Andy’s mom pulls into the parking lot and the toys get their first look at their possible new home: Sunnyside Daycare. Woody is still trying to maintain order. All he wants is to get everyone back to Andy’s house and that’s not going to happen if the other toys start to see daycare as a viable alternative to the attic. But that’s exactly what’s happening. I particularly love Rex’s line here. All of the other toys are excited by glimpses of the playground and the promise of happy children who will play with them, but Rex concludes that daycare must be a nice place solely because they have a rainbow on the door.

Inside Sunnyside, under the cut

Thoughts on “Tangled”

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

Flynn and Rapunzel, the stars of Tangled

A busy Thanksgiving weekend kept me from seeing Tangled – Disney’s first computer animated fairy tale feature – during its first days of release. But after the holiday excitement had died down, my husband and I caught a Monday night showing. A big part of the reason that I was looking forward to Tangled was that Glen Keane – one of my all-time favorite animators – had a big role in the film’s development. I had also enjoyed last year’s The Princess and the Frog and while I don’t want to see Disney doing nothing but classic fairy tales, I did think putting out a few such films was a good way for Disney to reestablish its identity after so many years of the studio trying to find its place in a theatrical animation world dominated by Pixar and DreamWorks. But there were troubling signs as well. The movie had spent an unusually long time in development and gone through some major changes before the final story was settled on. (One version, called Rapunzel Unbraided, was planned as a Shrek-like sendup of the fairy tale genre where an evil witch transports a squabbling real world couple into the realm of fairy tales to break the track record of constant happy endings.) Disney marketing’s last-minute changes to make the film more appealing to boys – focusing much of the advertising on the male lead and changing the movie’s name from Rapunzel to Tangled – did not inspire confidence. Glen Keane had originally been one of the directors of the film, but was replaced along with his co-director Dean Wellins by Nathan Greno and Byron Howard. So I went to see Tangled with a mix of excitement and worry. Happily, my excitement turned out to be justified. For while it’s not perfect, Tangled is a very good movie and a worthy addition to the Disney film library.

Full review under the cut

Saying Goodbye: Toy Story 3 – Part One

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010
This article is part of the series Saying Goodbye – Toy Story 3. To jump to any other article in the series, please use the following links.
Part OnePart TwoPart ThreePart FourPart Five

Andy choosing between Woody and Buzz

The success of Toy Story 3 should not have been a surprise to anyone. It was preceded by two very popular movies and created by a studio with an excellent track record for producing films that won the praise of critics and the dollars of audiences. As with Toy Story 2, it would have been easy for the Pixar filmmakers to churn out an easy, unambitious film and count on the audience’s fond memories of these characters to bring them into theaters. Instead, Pixar crafted what might be their riskiest film yet and as we now know, it was a risk that paid off. Now that the movie is out on DVD, we can take the time to examine each shot and scene and figure out why this film would have been a winner even if it had not been the third and final Toy Story film.

The beginning of the end, after the cut

In My Private Hell, All Animation Looks Like This

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

There is value in watching bad animation. It’s kind of a necessary attitude for someone who watches and writes about animation on a regular basis. But it’s also something I truly believe. Watching bad animation reminds me of why the animation I do like works and highlights what makes that good animation work. The absence of these elements in bad animation makes them easier to see in successful animation. Watching films and TV shows and other works that I end up not liking helps me to better define not only what kinds of animation I enjoy or dislike, but why it is that I feel that way.

So I sit through the overly ambitious projects that don’t reach the heights they’re aiming for, the watered-down copies of a successful formula, and the stories that treat their audiences like utter morons. Because I know I’m at least learning something from the experience, something that I can pass on to you the reader. And yes, tearing apart a film that truly deserves it can be a lot of fun.

But every so often, I come across a piece of animation so ill-conceived, so wretched, so outright bad that I’m not sure what I’m getting out of it. It could be a reminder that even some of the worst animation I’ve ever seen could be much worse. And under different circumstances, I might be able to laugh at how unrelentingly awful this thing is. But as it stands, I feel like I’m watching one of my favorite childhood memories being subjected to a severe beating with the ugly stick. And this is only a trailer for what I’m assuming is a full-length movie. I generally try not to judge movies by their trailers, since a trailer can only tell you so much. But in this case….well, maybe it’s better if you just see it for yourself. Proceed with caution, though. This is going to hurt.

Don\’t say I didn\’t warn you.

Ice Age – Review

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010

The heroes of Ice Age

Ice Age is a film I hadn’t seen until now. I was never dead set against seeing it, but it wasn’t something I made a point of watching either. I was aware of the film’s plot, had once seen a minute or two while flipping channels, and knew it was very successful, spawning two sequels with a third planned for a 2012 release. Now that I’e actually seen Ice Age, I’m left wondering how a such an average film became such a hit.

Sid is a sloth so dumb and obnoxious that his own family has decided to leave him behind when they migrate. Manny is a loner mammoth with a hidden tragic past. Diego is a sabertooth tiger whose pack has a grudge against the local human tribe. The three are brought together by a human baby who becomes separated from the tribe. Sid wants to return the baby to his family. Diego wants to bring the baby to the tiger pack as his leader ordered him to. Manny wants to do whatever is going to rid him of all of his new companions the fastest. So Ice Age is a prehistoric road trip with a baby, an annoying guy, a mean guy, and the guy who has to keep them all on track and off each others’ throats.

More icy road trip after the cut.

Brenda Chapman No Longer Directing “Brave”

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

As you may already know, Pixar’s upcoming film Brave has undergone a big change. Originally titled “The Bear and the Bow,” Brave has garnered attention for being Pixar’s first film to visit the world of knights and princesses that was once Disney’s turf, for being the first Pixar film with a female main character, and for its director, Brenda Champan. Chapman has an impressive animation resume, including story work on films such as The Little Mermaid, Beuaty and the Beast, The Lion King, Chicken Run, and Cars and a turn in the director’s chair on DreamWorks’ Prince of Egypt. In fact, I was just admiring her lovely storyboarding when I was reading Tale As Old As Time. But what was really drawing attention to Brenda Champman’s role as director of Brave was that she was the first woman to direct a Pixar film. Or she would have been, had she not been replaced as director by story artist Mark Andrews, a move that reportedly became official sometime in the last two weeks.

Thoughts on Pixar\’s decision under the cut