Archive for the ‘movies’ Category

Brushing Off The Pixie Dust – The Business of Studio Animation

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Toy Story 3 is now the highest grossing animated film of all time. Box Office Mojo calculates the film’s current worldwide earnings at over $980 million and it tops the domestic charts for the year thus far. This kind of success in the entertainment industry is bound to spawn imitators. My hope is that filmmakers will take inspiration from the quality of animation and attention to detail found in Pixar’s films or the idea that kids can and will watch films containing harsh truths and bittersweet endings. But I know that somebody somewhere is going to come away with the idea that animation is the path to guaranteed success and that nothing could be easier than gathering up a couple of creative types and having them make the next big hit animated movie.

Of course, we know better. We’ve read the books, watched the documentaries, and poured over the DVD bonus features. We know that even the most creative people in the world don’t wake up one morning with the idea for an animated film and have the whole thing done in a month. Animation has its own challenges, from trying again and again to get a particular pose right to having to scrap a finished scene because of story changes to plain old artist’s block. It’s hard work and it isn’t always hard work that pays off. For every Toy Story 3, there are any number of animated films that enjoy only modest success, more that fail outright, and still more that have trouble even getting into theaters.

Take, for example, the unfortunate tale of Tugger: The Jeep 4×4 Who Wanted To Fly. The Orlando Sentinel first detailedthe film’s troubled history back in 2006 and revisited the story when the film’s director was arrested and charged with fraud. (Both articles came to my attention via Cartoon Brew.) Tugger might have been just one more forgotten animated film were it not for the allegations that director Jeffrey Varab lured in investors with assurances of deals for distribution that hadn’t actually been signed, failed to pay animators, and never repaid money he was loaned for production expenses. Varab claims that Tugger writer and storyboard supervisor Woody Woodman and one of the investors in the film are trying to ruin him and that Tugger‘s extremely brief flight through theaters was not an actual release, but a test screening. In the comments section on just about any article on Varab’s arrest, you’ll find people citing Tugger‘s woes as part of a long history of underhanded behavior by Varab, people defending Varab as a good and trustworthy person, and a couple of people who think that Varab’s methods may have been shady, but they’re pretty much business as usual in Hollywood. The facts of Tugger‘s production may not be clear until the court cases surrounding it are resolved. But what is clear is that is clear is that simply being a computer animated film for children did not save Tugger from crashing and leaving a lot of unhappy people in its wake.

This is not the only way an animated film can crash and burn. Comb through the history of animation and you’re bound to come across projects and whole studios that came and went without much notice or never got even one production off the ground. Some are true tragedies, tales of enthusiastic artists with big, ambitious ideas who just couldn’t get the business end of the equation to work out. There are also ill-concieved studios and ideas based around the most, bland, safe, uninspired projects and business deals shadier than those e-mails requesting your help in getting money out of a foreign country. And everything in between: idealistic young animators who entered into terrible financial deals to fund their projects, artists so obsessed with making their work perfect that the film goes horribly over budget and never gets finished, studios that get all the money lined up in the most legitimate, above the board ways but comes out with films that never catch on, terrific films that are horribly marketed or barely released, and companies that are so focused on potential merchandising and fast food premiums and theme parks that the actual film is almost an afterthought.

Why am I telling you all of this? Because the risky, business side of studio animation is so often overlooked. The movie industry has long been associated with dreams; think of the fantasy of Hollywood as a place where anyone can become a star. The process of animation seems so inherently magical – making drawings, polygons, puppets, and the like come to life – that it’s even easier to coat the entire process in a sparkling veil of pixie dust. Even the tendency of American theatrical animation to tell stories for children plays a role in how the industry is viewed. We see so many animated movies about characters who pursue their dreams and find happiness in spite of all odds that we sometimes want to believe that the animation industry works on the same principle, that anyone with a dream and the will to make it happen can succeed. It is, as Jiminy Cricket puts it in Pinocchio, “a very lovely thought, but not at all practical.”

You might think that knowing about all the obstacles lying between an animated film and success would give me a dim view of studio animation. But that isn’t true. Everything I’ve learned about it over the years has made me appreciate the animation I love more, not less. Knowing how much works goes into crafting a good story, designing an appealing characters, making that character seem to think and feel, creating a convincing environment, and making the result seem natural and effortless has given me a greater respect for movies that are able to accomplish such a daunting task. The same is true of knowing what the business of studio animation is like. I don’t think it’s a perfect system and it still frustrates me when I see a good movie or a good studio fall prey to financial troubles. But knowing all the pressures facing animated films makes it all the more impressive when a movie does succeed, when a film feels like it was made in that nonexistent world where everyone is happy to throw unlimited amounts of money into production just so the movie can be as good as it can possibly be, or when a young artist looks at everything he or she must overcome to even a film into theaters and still has the courage to try to make the next great animated movie.

The Bluth Factor: The Pebble and the Penguin

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Hubie and Rocko

“The pebble had the better agent.” – my dad

Despite the above quote, no one in my family had ever seen The Pebble and the Penguin before now. Back in 1995 when the film came out, I was completely uninterested in Don Bluth’s animated films in particular (justifiably so) and non-Disney animated films in general (less justifiably). Just from the confusingly worded title and run-of-the-mill poster art, I could tell that this was not a movie that I wanted to see. In this case, my instincts were right on. The Pebble and the Penguin is a dull, confused, aggravating mess of a movie. I was set to call it the worst Don Bluth film I had ever seen, but as I read up on the film’s production, I felt hesitant to give Bluth all of the blame for a movie he had all but disowned.

A little background under the cut.

Why I Love Animation: My Favorite Moviegoing Experience

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Belle at the bookshelf

Thanks to Roger Ebert’s Twitter feed, I recently read a terrific article in which writers and filmmakers discuss their most memorable moviegoing experiences. Now this isn’t the same thing as writers and filmmakers discussing their favorite movies. Sometimes the key factor is a great movie, but other times it’s the audience, the theater itself, or some personal realization the viewer comes to while watching the film. Not all of the experiences are positive and in one case, the movie in question was truly awful. It was a fascinating read and it got me thinking about what my most memorable moviegoing experience was.

My moviegoing experiences, good and bad, after the cut.

Thoughts on “Waking Sleeping Beauty”

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

I wanted to see Waking Sleeping Beauty from the moment I heard about it. A documentary about the revival of Disney animation in the 80s and 90s directed and narrated by the producer of several of the films from that time sounded right up my alley. I had hoped to go out to New York to see it, but the timing never worked out. So I was very happy to discover that the film was coming to my home state, specifically one town over from where I live.

My thoughts on the film under the cut

Nick Nadel Reviews “When the Wind Blows”

Friday, July 9th, 2010

My friend and fellow writer Nick Nadel has written a review of the obscure British film When the Wind Blows. I’ve never seen the film and it has yet to recieve a DVD release in the U.S., so I was interested to learn about this grim tale of an elderly couple faced with the aftermath of a nuclear bomb attack. Nick gives a good overview of the movie’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as it’s place in the pantheon of horribly depressing animated movies.

My Last Word On “The Last Airbender”

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

I don’t think I would have been excited for The Last Airbender, the live-action film version of the animated TV series Avatar: The Last Airbender, even if I didn’t have serious concerns about the casting. I lost interest in M. Night Shyamalan‘s films after The Village. The initial teaser trailer didn’t get me excited and didn’t convey what made this concept special and different from any other martial arts movie out there. (My husband came up with the simultaneously brilliant and obvious idea that a live-action remake of the TV series opening should have been the teaser trailer.) On top of that, I just didn’t see the point. Avatar: The Last Airbender was already an amazing TV series. I didn’t – and still don’t – see what a live-action movie based on the TV series and covering the exact same material as the TV series in a much shorter time frame than the TV series could gope to accomplish. At best, it could have been a very faithful live-action reproduction of the TV show’s first season, something I have little interest in seeing. The point seems almost moot now, since the vast majority of critics have concluded that the movie is not very good.

But, as you almost certainly know by now, there is a casting controversy, centered around the fact that most of the main characters in a film based on a show steeped in Asian culture are played by Caucasian actors. It’s this fact that has dropped my attitude towards the film from “maybe I’ll rent it or watch it on cable” to “not interested at all.” I find this decision off-putting, disrespectful to the source material, and blatantly racist. Shyamalan, Paramount Pictures, and the film’s other defenders have been twisting themselves into knots trying to argue that this isn’t a whitewash. That if you take into account the secondary and background characters, the casting is actually quite diverse. That the show was set in a fantasy world where neither Europe nor Asia exist. That we live in a post-racial society and should be open to “colorblind casting” – a weaselly little term supposedly meaning that the film’s casting took only the skill of the actors into account and not the ethnicity or skin tone of the character in the source material, but that I have only heard applied to projects where – through some amazing coincidence – the “best actors for the job” all turn out to be White when the original characters were not. None of these arguments speak louder to me than do screenshots of Katara and Sokka – members of the Inuit-like Southern Water Tribe – compared with their live-action counterparts or Paramount’s own casting call for young actors to play Aang, specifying that they are looking for kids who are “Caucasian or any other ethnicity”.

My decision not to see this movie was greatly influenced by an essay on the subject by talented comics creator and fan of Avatar: The Last Airbender Derek Kirk Kim. It’s an excellent blend of point-by-point answer to all of the defenses of the film’s casting as well as a personal response to the issues it raises. Since then, I’ve read other pieces on the issue, including “FacePainting” – which puts the controversy into historical context and includes a lot of pictures comparing the animated characters to their live-action counterparts, and this comic on the subject by Gene Luen Yang.

So where do you stand? Has the casting controversy sapped your desire to see the film too? Are you still going to check it out, despite your qualms about the changes made? Have you seen it already? Could you care less about the race of the actors? Whatever your opinion, and whether you agree or disagree with mine, I want to hear it.

Thoughts on “Toy Story 3″

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Toy Story 3 poster

The following article discusses a new film currently in theaters. While I will try avoid revealing too much of the movie’s plot, there are going to be some spoilers. If you would prefer to avoid spoilers, see the movie first, then read the article. Otherwise, you’ve been warned.

I knew I wanted to see Toy Story 3 from the moment I knew there was going to be a Toy Story 3. (More accurately, from the moment I knew there was going to be a Pixar-helmed Toy Story 3. The eventually scrapped sequel that Disney’s now defunct Circle 7 Animation was less of a sure thing.) After all, this film would be the third in a series that included the first of Pixar’s animated features and one of my favorite movies of all time. So as the film’s debut grew nearer, I tried to learn as little about it as possible. I did see a trailer or two and ran into a couple of details here and there – some inadvertently. But I stayed away from books, news segments, “making of” information, and reviews. Even with this lack of new information, my expectations for the film were high, so high that my one fear was that no movie – no matter how good – could possibly live up to them.

Leaving the theater on Friday, I was not disappointed.

More on the toys\’ third film under the cut.

Lost Animation – A Goofy Movie

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Typical father and son road trip

I’m honestly not sure if A Goofy Movie belongs in lost animation. It is a Disney film. It did get a theatrical release back in 1995 and later video and DVD releases. It even got a direct-to-video sequel, entitled An Extremely Goofy Movie, five years later. And among many of my friends, it remains a favorite. On the other hand, it was not treated as a major Disney release; Pocahontas was the Disney feature for the year. Despite a good-sized advertising campaign, the movie kind of came and went in theaters. It came in second at the box office in its opening weekend, but earned less than half of the first place Bad Boys. It was the fifty-first highest grossing film of the year, well behind fourth place Pocahontas and the year’s biggest earner: Toy Story. I think the film often gets written off as a second tier Disney flick or a movie-length promotion for the TV series Goof Troop. That’s a shame, because A Goofy Movie is a surprisingly good film, both funny and touching.

Hit the open road under the cut.

When Disney Went Digital – Bolt

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Bolt, Mittens, and Rhino

I skipped seeing Bolt in theaters. I wasn’t dead set against seeing it, but I wasn’t in a rush to do so either. I found Disney’s first stab at computer animation, Chicken Little, underwhelming and a very muddled marketing campaign drove me away from Meet the Robinsons. I had also been reading about the film’s troubled development process. Originally called “American Dog,” the movie was to be written and directed by Chris Sanders, one of the two directors of the highly successful Lilo and Stitch. After clashing with new chief creative officer John Lasseter over the direction of the story, Sanders was removed as director. (He subsequently left Disney and went on to reunite with his Lilo and Stitch directing partner Dean DeBlois and direct How To Train Your Dragon for DreamWorks.) The film was given to directors Chris Williams and Byron Howard, reworked, and completed in just eighteen months. So my expectations for Bolt were not high. But Bolt did have a few things going for it, enough to make me want to watch it eventually. This was Disney’s third computer animated feature and the one to have the most input from Lasseter. The reviews, while not glowing, were positive. On top of all that, I’m a sucker for puppies. Right, Dante?

My puppy!

Yes, that’s right! Who’s a handsome boy? Who’s a handsome…

Errr, yes. Let’s move on, shall we?

Moving on.

Thoughts on “The Secret of Kells”

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Brendan and Aisling

When The Secret of Kells was named as one of the five films nominated for the Best Animated Feature Oscar, the most common reaction was “What’s The Secret of Kells? It was a fair question. The Irish film had received only an extremely limited release in the U.S. I had read about it on a couple of animation news sites and was pleasantly surprised when it received the Academy Award nomination. I didn’t expect it would beat Up, which was favored to win the Feature Animation category. But I was hoping that the attention would earn the film a slightly wider release and an eventual U.S. DVD release. The latter hasn’t happened yet, but seems likely. The former is already happening. While The Secret of Kells isn’t playing everywhere, more theaters have started showing it in the wake of its Oscar nomination. Because of this, I was able to catch an evening showing last Friday.

Discover the secret under the cut.